Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-93535-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 03:50:27 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, 
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, 
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>, 
 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <65e82e533857c_a463929462@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <ZeXQup48+X6U9TQ/@tpad>
References: <ZeXQup48+X6U9TQ/@tpad>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next -v3] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key
 if CPU isolation is configured
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> For systems that use CPU isolation (via nohz_full), creating or destroying
> a socket with

- timestamping (SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE) might cause a
+ SO_TIMESTAMP, SO_TIMESTAMPNS or SO_TIMESTAMPING with flag
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE will cause a

> static key to be enabled/disabled. This in turn causes undesired
> IPIs to isolated CPUs.
> 
> So enable the static key unconditionally, if CPU isolation is enabled,
> thus avoiding the IPIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index c588808be77f..15a32f5900e6 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
>  #include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
>  #include <net/page_pool/types.h>
>  #include <net/page_pool/helpers.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>  
>  #include "dev.h"
>  #include "net-sysfs.h"
> @@ -11851,3 +11852,14 @@ static int __init net_dev_init(void)
>  }
>  
>  subsys_initcall(net_dev_init);
> +
> +static int __init net_dev_late_init(void)
> +{
> +	/* avoid static key IPIs to isolated CPUs */
> +	if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_MISC))
> +		net_enable_timestamp();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(net_dev_late_init);
> 

Can this be included in the existing net_dev_init
subsys_initcall?

Aside from that small question LGTM.