Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-93948-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240306085622.87248-1-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> <26f3e99c-8f57-4779-a679-2085e469d9cd@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <26f3e99c-8f57-4779-a679-2085e469d9cd@siemens.com>
From: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:07:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEEQ3wnDKdhCH4yz+MY+Xks21jLnuFiyx-xxa7CFczokG2shvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "riscv/efistub: Ensure
 GP-relative addressing is not used"
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, 
	ardb@kernel.org, xuzhipeng.1973@bytedance.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, 
	samitolvanen@google.com, bp@alien8.de, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, 
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, nathan@kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jan,

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 8:52=E2=80=AFPM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> =
wrote:
>
> On 06.03.24 09:56, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > This reverts commit afb2a4fb84555ef9e61061f6ea63ed7087b295d5.
> >
>
> This comes without a reason - which is likely something around "will fix
> this properly later". But then you regress first and only fix
> afterwards. Can't that be done the other way around?

Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. Can you help explain it
more clearly? Do you mean "delete mno-relax instead of revert
directly?"


Thanks,
Yunhui