Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-94280-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:40:31 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	mhklinux@outlook.com, petr@tesarici.cz, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Document min_align_mask assumption
Message-ID: <Zeicf08_vcO3oYnn@8bytes.org>
References: <dbb4d2d8e5d1691ac9a6c67e9758904e6c447ba5.1709553942.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dbb4d2d8e5d1691ac9a6c67e9758904e6c447ba5.1709553942.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:05:42PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> iommu-dma does not explicitly reference min_align_mask since we already
> assume that that will be less than or equal to any typical IOVA granule.
> We wouldn't realistically expect to see the case where it is larger, and
> that would be non-trivial to support, however for the sake of reasoning
> (particularly around the interaction with SWIOTLB), let's clearly
> enforce the assumption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Applied, thanks Robin.