Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:07:13 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, olof@lixom.net,
       mingo@elte.hu, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: [patch 0/5] enhance WARN_ON series
Message-ID: <20080105190713.73745ec6@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Organization: Intel
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1047
Lines: 21

3rd try for this patch series; now with a split up patch for __WARN_ON

This series has the goal of extending the usefulness of the WARN_ON() information,
at least on architectures that use the generic WARN_ON() infrastructure. (Those who
do their own thing either already have the extra information, or could consider
switching to the generic code). In order to do that, WARN_ON() first needs to 
be uninlined since there's like 1200 callsites and adding code to each of those
isn't pretty.

As part of this, I had to split the __WARN_ON patch in -mm into 2 pieces, one to 
introduce __WARN_ON, and a separate one to do the ifdef cleanup. 

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/