Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95233-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <1accaae2-b034-4afe-bb80-98209b42c348@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:36:40 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent
Content-Language: en-US
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240125-topic-thermal-v1-0-3c9d4dced138@linaro.org>
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240125-topic-thermal-v1-0-3c9d4dced138@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 25/01/2024 13:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
> This series simplifies it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---

Applied, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog