Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754465AbYAFJzd (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:55:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751124AbYAFJzX (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:55:23 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39010 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750837AbYAFJzW (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:55:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:55:01 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mark Lord Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-ID: <20080106095501.GG26291@elte.hu> References: <200801052042.56042.rjw@sisk.pl> <47801690.3090106@rtr.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47801690.3090106@rtr.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1959 Lines: 46 * Mark Lord wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since >> 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know >> of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. > .. >> Subject : 20000+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.24 >> Submitter : Mark Lord >> Date : 2007-12-02 04:23 >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/1/141 >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9489 >> Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven >> > .. > > I have only seen that one once, and I think it was Arjan who said that > it has been observed rarely by other people as well. The bugzilla > entry is mostly just to track the darned thing, but it seems unlikely > that anyone will find/fix it for 2.6.24. No big deal, but it would be > good to have somebody knowledgeable in clocks/interrupts try and track > it down. > > I wonder if it's just a babbling IRQ on resume, before the driver has > run it's resume code or something ? i've read the discussions, and i cannot see it analyzed anywhere _what_ causes the wakeups. And how are these wakeups counted? Is this based on powertop output: Wakeups-from-idle per second : 20.4 interval: 1.8s ? Somewhere i saw it mentioned that "the CPU throws out of C mode". What does that mean - does it mean we try to idle again and again, but we immediately return from C mode - while this all looks like "idle" time to the scheduler (so 'top' will show lots of idle time), but the ACPI wakeup counters are going up like mad? What is /proc/interrupts doing when this happens - is any of the irq sources going upwards? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/