Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95293-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
To: dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Cc: amadeus@jmu.edu.cn,
	andersson@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: add 1.2GHz CPU Frequency
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2024 18:02:21 +0800
Message-Id: <20240307100221.709254-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJpp++=NLZVv7we3Cwz+G7vL9xFoXqHgsMyQZ8tgdNHKcyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8EJpp++=NLZVv7we3Cwz+G7vL9xFoXqHgsMyQZ8tgdNHKcyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi, Dmitry
> So... Do you consider this SoC to be IPQ6018 or IPQ6000?

According to the chip silk screen, this is ipq6000. In addition, I have
never seen a board with the SoC chip silk screen printed as ipq6018.

> And anyway, this should be explained in the commit message. Otherwise
> anybody reading the commit will have the same questions as I do.

Sorry, I will explain this in more detail.

Thanks,
Chukun

-- 
2.25.1