Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95856-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <49a7c0b667abe23d95d67cf0cf7ea7e193d9f2a1.1709773065.git.len.brown@intel.com>
 <dc6c4d98-e56a-448d-b372-38ce0cd927e9@nvidia.com> <CAJvTdK=Fbo0in7diYv_4Zk_-zrOPP4skDgpTMOYw-UM8=3R29Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZenacXkUAh4I1gkK@kbusch-mbp> <Zenb8eDX9Hq6YbQQ@kbusch-mbp>
In-Reply-To: <Zenb8eDX9Hq6YbQQ@kbusch-mbp>
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:25:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKn1xMP-WJhd64XkEk3cznhp4vkVjTynwp+10TLO8_FrgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme: Use pr_dbg, not pr_info, when setting shutdown timeout
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, maxg@mellanox.com, 
	axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:23=E2=80=AFAM Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> wro=
te:

> Or maybe we can make the print less scary: how about changing "shutdown
> timeout" to "D3 entry latency"?

Works for me!

(The problem with the word "timeout" is that is is usually something a
human should know about, along with "error" "fail" "abort" etc)

you sending a patch, or shall I?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel