Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757644AbYAFO2Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:28:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754793AbYAFO2E (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:28:04 -0500 Received: from mfe1.polimi.it ([131.175.12.23]:53824 "EHLO polimi.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951AbYAFO2D (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:28:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:24:17 +0100 From: Stefano Brivio To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-ID: <20080106152417.5cb3d186@morte> In-Reply-To: <20080106093853.GD26291@elte.hu> References: <200801052042.56042.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080106093853.GD26291@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.3.310218, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.2.311128, Antispam-Data: 2007.11.6.30824 X-PerlMx-Spam: No virus found, Gauge=II, Probability=22%, Report='RELAY_IN_PBL_11 2.5, BODY_SIZE_900_999 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RELAY_IN_PBL 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1121 Lines: 34 On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:38:53 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3 > > Submitter : Stefano Brivio > > Date : 2007-11-29 08:36 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475 > > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132 > > this holds a series of problems, we've applied everything we wanted to > 2.6.24 already we'll do the full stack of fixes for this in 2.6.25. > (changing printk was deemed inappropriate so late in the -rc cycle) So > perhaps mark this as WILL_FIX_LATER and unmark it as a regression? > Stefano, do you agree? Agreed. > b43 works fine for you in the latest .24-rc kernel, correct? Correct. :) -- Ciao Stefano -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/