Received: by 2002:ab2:3319:0:b0:1ef:7a0f:c32d with SMTP id i25csp48454lqc; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:57:39 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCWUtr3EriytIWUnS2E/wdm2wGB94AUacUXC2/bDtpTVq80cD1PgheCF2KmzDaEuGgAkUr8OUVuJd9nXAHTSn88tyOZNSH0Doax/E5Zn+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGsxXiUKIwOYwRwYDuRblfo3GuHXOv8JLnQkc5XGxXWJYnQ0K1Fj67T1VVGkphP29tgEAj7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:594d:b0:a43:67c9:8c99 with SMTP id g13-20020a170906594d00b00a4367c98c99mr12282273ejr.40.1709834259325; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:57:39 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22-20020a170906d19600b00a3e66296cdfsi7126644ejz.753.2024.03.07.09.57.39 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95985-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=bP9Et7zi; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95985-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-95985-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 125AD1F21BBA for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0D9131E21; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bP9Et7zi" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A65B130E44 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709834246; cv=none; b=l3yTrBaS/PbYxFRWgpOBxWB1uXfRSqQsg0RSmU+XVpCoUnhFLoYYnGVXZ1IDSv13qUA5LfZ0PGUygLSc7elRcejjZMFdU0hfvfsobiao0H8tDQSlmhI8EBfMinFtHOEUu2QCLGAxSRcREzc/Td/+6dcmg8QS/b4DTfHIl0ZG+UM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709834246; c=relaxed/simple; bh=waq91CYvNLCsRev1erIY6js5vkjT9ek80U+wM6ipCrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MDe+g++MUhs9F9a+8JtrVAmJAZUH0SczJp8PGuw4cYaXIQ3KtfbVF9eMQC52eZKbPrPdesFuvEIp1VYk6+jAgv69uLGrcKl2TyL6RNL1mrMqyCMLOlcmYmmFGWqoDC5cggXn6U1wf9Tzf04wnHrFPCdVKHLnNGihsHK3cNG4wkU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bP9Et7zi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709834245; x=1741370245; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=waq91CYvNLCsRev1erIY6js5vkjT9ek80U+wM6ipCrQ=; b=bP9Et7ziGhImBg8yY3V6C0lg7huUl9jWJlUtKzilPRGSMCynuJdXyiVw DMt4NR8Is1qPe2ioXvZzyDAM6NPALIOZ4N+LH/C3tQZuWa+N0obeNwfrt KLJuxp6cTAvlf54P/to0XmhjxNykojC1rhcT+hTRahPbX5fQUEPANFeKp psvUzeLrzmJouqqA4iEPJan0TCetXPtuqHGyDUwjM/KdS86E7n8d68aIK UtniTYGenkfod8i17MVbtDC175tDiekvv4R1zMSPNxfz/qrs/Bubct/FS HzfcSELd+TgDctVHxj18OedobI7r6jXbs8IyG3QQ3+glDPsapKg29bCAU w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11006"; a="15952935" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,107,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="15952935" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2024 09:57:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11006"; a="914220720" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,107,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914220720" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2024 09:57:03 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1riHzJ-0000000AdGY-2K9c; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 19:57:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:57:01 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups Message-ID: References: <20240307143644.3787260-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <46qzdowo2om2bbuokiksah27x4qok7hffiefwsj4bihz2xg62y@hxrag6h55zw7> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <46qzdowo2om2bbuokiksah27x4qok7hffiefwsj4bihz2xg62y@hxrag6h55zw7> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:12:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 06:43:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: .. > > > I wonder about your choice of recipients. I would have added Krzysztof > > > to To and me at most to Cc:. > > > > It's automatically generated using get_maintainers.pl. > > See details in the source of the script [1] I'm using. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh > > Getting something wrong automatically isn't an excuse for getting it > wrong :-) I'm not sure why you think it's wrong. You worked on the code lately and Git heuristics considered that over threshold of 67%. > That scripts has: > > to=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-m --no-r) > cc=$(git show -$count "$COMMIT" | scripts/get_maintainer.pl $OPTS --no-l) > > I recommend to swap the values for to and cc here to make sure you have > the maintainer in $to and the relevant lists in $cc. Hmm... I don't remember why I put it this way. Btw, you are the first one for the entire life cycle of that script (3 years?) who complains about such details... So, patches are welcome! :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko