Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-96369-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240202234057.2085863-1-irogers@google.com> <CAP-5=fVjAHqAHHLqE=3v2bP6S6k98psiuZds7TUTFCT7RgMFdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM9d7ciPYMd4zckrcgnPtradZ_bvaNOHji1tkkYQu_TTF5=eYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7ciPYMd4zckrcgnPtradZ_bvaNOHji1tkkYQu_TTF5=eYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:47:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgbxHZoaq4ZLCda-6TW5A+b+-8dSrRApk+AjcTVNC5hNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Clean up libperf cpumap's empty function
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, 
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, 
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>, 
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida?= <andrealmeid@igalia.com>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, 
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, 
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, 
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>, 
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>, 
	Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>, Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>, 
	Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>, 
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>, Paran Lee <p4ranlee@gmail.com>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>, 
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, 
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ian,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:04=E2=80=AFPM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> =
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:03=E2=80=AFPM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> w=
rote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> =
wrote:
> > >
> > > Rename and clean up the use of libperf CPU map functions particularly
> > > focussing on perf_cpu_map__empty that may return true for maps
> > > containing CPUs but also with an "any CPU"/dummy value.
> > >
> > > perf_cpu_map__nr is also troubling in that iterating an empty CPU map
> > > will yield the "any CPU"/dummy value. Reduce the appearance of some
> > > calls to this by using the perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu macro.
> > >
> > > v3: Address handling of "any" is arm-spe/cs-etm patch.
> > > v2: 6 patches were merged by Arnaldo. New patch added ensure empty
> > >     maps are allocated as NULL (suggested by James Clark). Hopefully =
a
> > >     fix to "perf arm-spe/cs-etm: Directly iterate CPU maps".
> > >
> > > Ian Rogers (8):
> > >   libperf cpumap: Add any, empty and min helpers
> > >   libperf cpumap: Ensure empty cpumap is NULL from alloc
> > >   perf arm-spe/cs-etm: Directly iterate CPU maps
> > >   perf intel-pt/intel-bts: Switch perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_emp=
ty
> > >     use
> > >   perf cpumap: Clean up use of perf_cpu_map__has_any_cpu_or_is_empty
> > >   perf arm64 header: Remove unnecessary CPU map get and put
> > >   perf stat: Remove duplicate cpus_map_matched function
> > >   perf cpumap: Use perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu when possible
> >
> > Ping. Thanks,
> > Ian
>
> Adrian and James, are you ok with this now?

I think James is fine now and the Intel-pt part seems straight-forward
so I'd like to merge this change.  Please tell me if you have any concerns.

Thanks,
Namhyung