Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-96414-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:07:42 -0800
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	erdemaktas@google.com, Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, chen.bo@intel.com,
	hang.yuan@intel.com, tina.zhang@intel.com, gkirkpatrick@google.com,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 064/121] KVM: TDX: Create initial guest memory
Message-ID: <20240308010742.GK368614@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <cover.1705965634.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <97bb1f2996d8a7b828cd9e3309380d1a86ca681b.1705965635.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
 <Zbrj5WKVgMsUFDtb@google.com>
 <CALzav=diVvCJnJpuKQc7-KeogZw3cTFkzuSWu6PLAHCONJBwhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240226180712.GF177224@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <Zdzdj6zcDqQJcrNx@google.com>
 <20240227141242.GT177224@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <Zd4cIxZPABFlt-sE@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zd4cIxZPABFlt-sE@google.com>

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:30:11AM -0800,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:50:55AM -0800,
> > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Please post an RFC for _just_ this functionality, and follow-up in existing,
> > > pre-v19 conversations for anything else that changed between v18 and v19 and might
> > > need additional input/discussion.
> > 
> > Sure, will post it. My plan is as follow for input/discussion
> > - Review SEV-SNP patches by Paolo for commonality 
> > - RFC patch to KVM_MAP_MEMORY or KVM_FAULTIN_MEMORY
> > - RFC patch for uKVM for confidential VM
> 
> uKVM?

I meant uAPI, sorry for typo.
Although I looked into a unified uAPI with SEV, the gain seem to be small or
none. I'm currently planning to drop it based on the feedback at
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZL%2Fr6Vca8WkFVaic@google.com/
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>