Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:17:41 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bot=F3n?= <mboton@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2
Message-ID: <20080106161741.GA10824@elte.hu>
References: <4780EC61.4020007@gmail.com> <20080106150417.GA14146@elte.hu> <4780F880.8030903@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4780F880.8030903@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 641
Lines: 18


* Miguel Bot?n <mboton@gmail.com> wrote:

> > in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl() and ioperm() 
> > syscalls to check whether they properly block/allow port IO?
> 
> I made a little app to check that iopl() and ioperm() were working 
> properly.

cool, thx. Could you check whether LTP includes something like that 
already - and if not, send it to the LTP maintainers?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/