Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-96816-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Feedback-ID: i36794607:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-251-g8332da0bf6-fm-20240305.001-g8332da0b
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8177b94d-82c9-42b6-85eb-728dec762162@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHp75VfmSWH3FWEHU+bGYDuo-nt1DJhY5Fvs83A-RGrtrsgWTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240306235021.976083-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <20240306235021.976083-4-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
 <87edclgoon.fsf@BL-laptop>
 <CAHp75VfmSWH3FWEHU+bGYDuo-nt1DJhY5Fvs83A-RGrtrsgWTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:18:54 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
 "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Chris Packham" <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
 "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
 "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
 "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
 "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
 "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
 devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: dts: marvell: Add 7-segment LED display on x530
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 10:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:36=E2=80=AFAM Gregory CLEMENT
> <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> wrote:
>>
>> Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> writes:
>>
>> > The Allied Telesis x530 products have a 7-segment LED display which=
 is
>> > used for node identification when the devices are stacked. Represent
>> > this as a gpio-7-segment device.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
>>
>> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
>>
>> Normally, this patch should be taken in mvebu and then merged by
>> arm-soc. However, I haven't seen any other patch touching this file (=
so
>> no risk of merge conflict) and I think it's too late for me to make a
>> new pull request to arm-soc. So I'm not against it being taken with t=
he
>> rest of the patches. However, I think it would be a good idea to see
>> what Arnd thinks about it.
>
> Arnd wasn't Cc'ed, now I added him.

I already have a 'late' branch for stuff that for some reason
was too late be part of the normal pull requests but should
still make it into 6.9. If this one is important, I don't
mind taking it.

On the other hand, from the patch description this one doesn't
seem that urgent, so I don't see much harm in delaying it
to v6.10, and using the normal process for it.

     Arnd