Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755757AbYAGJaS (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:30:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753927AbYAGJaF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:30:05 -0500 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:33349 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753068AbYAGJaC (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:30:02 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: Eblacs8wMzjx/TyzS35IlDguTRQak5453w4APMcjjhEo 1199698201 Subject: Re: umount -l , getcwd and /proc//cwd inconsistent From: Ian Kent To: bjdouma@xs4all.nl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1199696154.3156.74.camel@raven.themaw.net> References: <1199675850.3156.15.camel@raven.themaw.net> <4781E301.7000502@xs4all.nl> <1199696154.3156.74.camel@raven.themaw.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:29:37 +0900 Message-Id: <1199698177.3156.79.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-2.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1366 Lines: 38 On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:55 +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:29 +0100, Bauke Jan Douma wrote: > > Ian Kent wrote on 07-01-08 04:17: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Could someone please help me understand what's happening with, what > > > looks like inconsistent behavior, between getpwd and procfs readlink. > > > > > > Basically, from a bash shell, setting working directory to a mounted > > > directory all is fine with "pwd" and "/proc//cwd". Following a > > > "umount - l" on the mount "pwd" continues to return the expected string > > > but "/proc//cwd" returns an empty string. > > > > > > What I'm really after is why this happens because sys_getcwd and > > > proc_pid_readlink appear to do essentially the same thing to get the > > > string. > > > > > [snip] > > > > What does `/bin/pwd' return, when you do that instead of > > plain `pwd' (after the umount)? > > I did check that at one point and it returned the same as pwd. > I'll check again later, but I remember I explicitly checked that along > the way. Hey, I was sure I tested that. It, in fact, returns nothing also. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/