Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-98894-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:42:02 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52514: x86/reboot: VMCLEAR active VMCSes before
 emergency reboot
Message-ID: <20240311134202.GQ86322@google.com>
References: <2024030251-CVE-2023-52514-c93d@gregkh>
 <Ze7d0YCDKdu_LJWc@tiehlicka>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <Ze7d0YCDKdu_LJWc@tiehlicka>

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Michal Hocko wrote:

> On Sat 02-03-24 22:52:59, Greg KH wrote:
> > Description
> > ===========
> > 
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> > 
> > x86/reboot: VMCLEAR active VMCSes before emergency reboot
> > 
> > VMCLEAR active VMCSes before any emergency reboot, not just if the kernel
> > may kexec into a new kernel after a crash.  Per Intel's SDM, the VMX
> > architecture doesn't require the CPU to flush the VMCS cache on INIT.  If
> > an emergency reboot doesn't RESET CPUs, cached VMCSes could theoretically
> > be kept and only be written back to memory after the new kernel is booted,
> > i.e. could effectively corrupt memory after reboot.
> > 
> > Opportunistically remove the setting of the global pointer to NULL to make
> > checkpatch happy.
> > 
> > The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2023-52514 to this issue.
> 
> I do not really see the security aspect of this fix. Guests systems
> shouldn't be able to trigger host reboot nor any untrusted entity should
> on the host either or this would be a serious security hole.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

Thanks for reporting.

If Sean and/or Paolo agree, we can revoke the CVE for you.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]