Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-99610-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240302001139.604829-1-weilin.wang@intel.com>
 <20240302001139.604829-3-weilin.wang@intel.com> <CAM9d7cjz1JPM0MQ5m6V7DCgShCBNCd5uqVLotf61J3eu216mEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CO6PR11MB5635949BE12E694160F28D5CEE242@CO6PR11MB5635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR11MB5635949BE12E694160F28D5CEE242@CO6PR11MB5635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:27:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cguqEnxABCNYDr6W93sY3hPRBV1ieuWhy+6+H54OmWprA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] perf stat: Fork and launch perf record when
 perf stat needs to get retire latency value for a metric.
To: "Wang, Weilin" <weilin.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, 
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, 
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Taylor, Perry" <perry.taylor@intel.com>, 
	"Alt, Samantha" <samantha.alt@intel.com>, "Biggers, Caleb" <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:30=E2=80=AFPM Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@intel.com=
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 2:08 PM
> > To: Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.o=
rg>;
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > <acme@kernel.org>; Alexander Shishkin
> > <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>; Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>; Hun=
ter,
> > Adrian <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>=
;
> > linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Taylor,=
 Perry
> > <perry.taylor@intel.com>; Alt, Samantha <samantha.alt@intel.com>; Bigge=
rs,
> > Caleb <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] perf stat: Fork and launch perf record =
when
> > perf stat needs to get retire latency value for a metric.
> >
> > Hello Weilin,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:11=E2=80=AFPM <weilin.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
> > >
> > > When retire_latency value is used in a metric formula, perf stat woul=
d fork a
> > > perf record process with "-e" and "-W" options. Perf record will coll=
ect
> > > required retire_latency values in parallel while perf stat is collect=
ing
> > > counting values.
> > >
> > > At the point of time that perf stat stops counting, it would send sig=
term
> > signal
> > > to perf record process and receiving sampling data back from perf rec=
ord
> > from a
> > > pipe. Perf stat will then process the received data to get retire lat=
ency data
> > > and calculate metric result.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c     | 179
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  tools/perf/util/data.c        |   4 +
> > >  tools/perf/util/data.h        |   1 +
> > >  tools/perf/util/metricgroup.h |   7 ++
> > >  tools/perf/util/stat.h        |   3 +
> > >  5 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > index 5a3093541cff..3890a579349e 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > @@ -94,8 +94,13 @@
> > >  #include <perf/evlist.h>
> > >  #include <internal/threadmap.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "util/sample.h"
> > > +#include <sys/param.h>
> > > +#include <subcmd/run-command.h>
> > > +
> > >  #define DEFAULT_SEPARATOR      " "
> > >  #define FREEZE_ON_SMI_PATH     "devices/cpu/freeze_on_smi"
> > > +#define PERF_DATA              "-"
> > >
> > >  static void print_counters(struct timespec *ts, int argc, const char=
 **argv);
> > >
> > > @@ -162,7 +167,8 @@ static struct perf_stat_config stat_config =3D {
> > >         .ctl_fd                 =3D -1,
> > >         .ctl_fd_ack             =3D -1,
> > >         .iostat_run             =3D false,
> > > -       .tpebs_event_size =3D 0,
> > > +       .tpebs_event_size       =3D 0,
> > > +       .tpebs_pid              =3D -1,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static bool cpus_map_matched(struct evsel *a, struct evsel *b)
> > > @@ -687,12 +693,163 @@ static enum counter_recovery
> > stat_handle_error(struct evsel *counter)
> > >         return COUNTER_FATAL;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int __run_perf_record(void)
> > > +static int __run_perf_record(const char **record_argv)
> > >  {
> > > +       int i =3D 0;
> > > +       struct tpebs_event *e;
> >
> > Please put a blank line after the declaration.
> >
> >
> > >         pr_debug("Prepare perf record for retire_latency\n");
> > > +
> > > +
> >
> > A duplicate new line.
> >
> > > +       record_argv[i++] =3D "perf";
> > > +       record_argv[i++] =3D "record";
> > > +       record_argv[i++] =3D "-W";
> > > +
> > > +       if (stat_config.user_requested_cpu_list) {
> > > +               record_argv[i++] =3D "-C";
> > > +               record_argv[i++] =3D stat_config.user_requested_cpu_l=
ist;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       if (stat_config.system_wide)
> > > +               record_argv[i++] =3D "-a";
> > > +
> > > +       list_for_each_entry(e, &stat_config.tpebs_events, nd) {
> > > +               record_argv[i++] =3D "-e";
> > > +               record_argv[i++] =3D e->name;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       record_argv[i++] =3D "-o";
> > > +       record_argv[i++] =3D PERF_DATA;
> >
> > I don't think you need side-band records and synthesizing for this.
> > I'd like to disable all of them but it'd require changes in perf record=
.
> > For now, you need to pass --synth=3Dno at least.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> >
>
> Thanks Namhyung! I will update the code and send a new version.

Sure, let me finish my review before then.

Thanks,
Namhyung