Received: by 2002:ab2:710b:0:b0:1ef:a325:1205 with SMTP id z11csp778441lql; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUrJ1ABkjbtufZhSEqcUt6SzgwBvyVFms7AW8IQf0+54g7hs1fI1LvH7ovcgPVg5SbgO2XHtjgBDnGPNcZiU4M0Er02FDrasp2qvN+PdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErKhJEZZrG/Qle1LTxNVXGnP5CZD/PEIwpS5CWi1hUph8+Ug+BRT6MvnOeysH1XIz31qm6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1b0a:b0:3c2:4383:e339 with SMTP id bx10-20020a0568081b0a00b003c24383e339mr7304909oib.12.1710206796415; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ld4-20020a056a004f8400b006e69904aa49si2188036pfb.230.2024.03.11.18.26.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-99721-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="G+C6M9/C"; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-99721-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-99721-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1530E2814FD for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612671869; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G+C6M9/C" Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04DC07E2; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710206786; cv=none; b=IJw9Sv55kVnettdj1ndjEPm9vy/Ll2QO6vZLbN3rSGBUKGm0BBMHcU9gGMHxPo+vtC5IBWqZZvDglkVovopPi5I2haqCEPqHqdiCS3yyCvYv/0bMXZNXHtN/9iyg+yFayh9kpTKAlozVDxp5IZmzOJ/oU7L+THGd2qYErQKk/Es= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710206786; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GyA2AfVBUEUaHKxyGNy7I8OR2zGDzYXGB8bS0wH502E=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=JDD6i+/ZbcPlaGxzmYrbHv/7lZLV8h66I9223vDJTkcs5fOAj5BzJKwyG+uEgvIHlv2icACna11q6b4ogalDbEMFVVI8Xmv65QexAbAAPHKa8X8WQykcfQfhWQqv3VyRddzfxWcZ2VlVLJSMnU7NxmFVzDr2zm5fA2WL3wvVIT4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=G+C6M9/C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-413328344acso2183165e9.3; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710206783; x=1710811583; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kscZcOUOHWXZr8d7Aotv9yaf5lVIDmR/3s4rt3vEiJE=; b=G+C6M9/CvNcFPVWzOo3s/Up8DWBySnEx4afjJKWshiJ2S0ShzhciD45zw995Sn7uis K+bG+ccVBqex/o5Xh/BTSoB4U69ct9pRo9Yist/LnIy+2PWxBDECCy8inZMhWaTxJlQP 8X6HIWOMAwFO7wpNRSuIbyG6LmQ7QRToPyengeVItakieyqDpRtucZO1RAQUCghSM7Qy mlxHrHHJE+vKhvrG5ITeriOA4aA0YhnCKSHTpK0H8owajfe9V1FPmo0EGA+EL7HJJGoK taI0lpE1Ug6nVo+deyxiyUeT1GFHJRo9GK0QxFV9CZrD+73srxolbkOaUu2pxIVKM8EM PgKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710206783; x=1710811583; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kscZcOUOHWXZr8d7Aotv9yaf5lVIDmR/3s4rt3vEiJE=; b=pTXMy/UjWAR1SplmhBbxuTkvZNZkHvId7Uu54qpshTAlkHpuUzPYXhR2McdRtcqVkw zlC7HCPbOWC6vsyOJYzTakVQA5Ny11MyE8rds3LKBJyZMMlwKYUNfmHnldNKZKoStlCJ VdbfkwueR+f+5qGav6xwEeCNB+yh286YskFtdoo3nc/A9ExHSdSfzyVmWb8SbSs+vuEA Kjb9eLQTk56Pj31VPKj29AZMt2KkvqQ8p20P/mQ4JWjB9pI3+Ogdq0yi8vDCYHpeZMT/ mhCk7GCE0Irv8349TFlvz9X4h6FoqnW7ygMRvMpoKI/LbEF/MbtypWuG3U1SMk92c+zP CBBA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXThmdKkQKLNsvpfYGMInSoSiLAtIhsfBZCIK30zz/4pacqI4vtQUDr1XuvswEP+CCVojvtaEf8StnhiYs38C3w52Dq0Aw7pdvnvahFRjmYvGWrUXsW5yuDgXOb7JboMYxj X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxGgEM7Z4qzEr1dkFJRD1VCo67ZPOI8cvZUGeqf8EJUcZN9Ckw KS+XN/EmXiYLyi/kP/GTSuIqom5lJ3oDk/hteW4pDH424XK36YG9uuSdk2wNV9PIqHDYF/i0yHP tL37oCy9wnGHX1TOcWwhkJAYqEdU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f50f:0:b0:33e:7a7c:a058 with SMTP id q15-20020adff50f000000b0033e7a7ca058mr4928022wro.18.1710206783102; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/1] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64 To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Zi Shen Lim , Mark Rutland , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel , open list , "open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)" , Josh Poimboeuf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:11=E2=80=AFAM Puranjay Mohan wrote: > > On ARM64 with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, CFI warnings can be triggered by running > the bpf selftests. This is because the JIT doesn't emit proper CFI prolog= ues > for BPF programs, callbacks, and struct_ops trampolines. > > Example Warning: > > CFI failure at bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 (target: bpf_prog_fb8b097= ab47d164a_less+0x0/0x98; expected type: 0x9e4709a9) > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1488 at bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 .. > Running the selftests causes no CFI warnings: > --------------------------------------------- > > test_progs: Summary: 454/3613 PASSED, 62 SKIPPED, 74 FAILED > test_tag: OK (40945 tests) > test_verifier: Summary: 789 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Catalin, Mark, Could you please review and hopefully ack arm64 generic bits ? The JIT changes largely mimic x86 changes and look correct to me.