Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757471AbYAGP0m (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:26:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753605AbYAGP0f (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:26:35 -0500 Received: from Mycroft.westnet.com ([216.187.52.7]:59876 "EHLO Mycroft.westnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbYAGP0e (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:26:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18306.17536.212405.674762@stoffel.org> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:25:52 -0500 From: "John Stoffel" To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Adrian Bunk , James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , Ingo Molnar , Peter Osterlund , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done" In-Reply-To: <20080106191044.GA1105@1wt.eu> References: <1199316785.3258.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1199627875.5205.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080106144706.GA25419@elte.hu> <1199632845.5205.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080106171158.GM20473@parisc-linux.org> <1199640983.5205.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080106183402.GA7906@1wt.eu> <20080106185625.GM2082@does.not.exist> <20080106191044.GA1105@1wt.eu> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 26 I'll agree with what Willy wrote here, Bugzilla is a pain to use, you can't just dump an email into it and have it captured. I think we should be looking at something more like 'WebRT' which is an *issue* tracker software. But that too might be too heavy weight and too noisy as well. And suddenly it would starting putting ticket numbers onto all the non-problem conversations we have here on lkml as well, which I'm not sure we really want. Does it mean that we needs to have a 'bugs@kernel.org' email for people to report bugs/problems/issues, while lkml remains (but is copied for all 'bugs@kernel.org' emails) primarily the developer point of contact? The question to me really revolves around how do you automate the process in a transparent manner so that people don't have to change much how they interact with lkml. John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/