Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-100223-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:00:35 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de
Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/balancing: Switch the
 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t
 sched_balance_running' flag
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
 Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>, x86@kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org>
References: <20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <171024483537.398.15777779936541249793.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Robot-ID: <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Robot-Unsubscribe:
 Contact <mailto:tglx@linutronix.de> to get blacklisted from these emails
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     214c1b7f13954559cf09d5d04b934bf32ba4d618
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/214c1b7f13954559cf09d5d04b934bf32ba4d618
Author:        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:58:52 +01:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:03:39 +01:00

sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag

The 'balancing' spinlock added in:

  08c183f31bdb ("[PATCH] sched: add option to serialize load balancing")

.. is taken when the SD_SERIALIZE flag is set in a domain, but in reality it
is a glorified global atomic flag serializing the load-balancing of
those domains.

It doesn't have any explicit locking semantics per se: we just
spin_trylock() it.

Turn it into a ... global atomic flag. This makes it more
clear what is going on here, and reduces overhead and code
size a bit:

  # kernel/sched/fair.o: [x86-64 defconfig]

     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    60730	   2721	    104	  63555	   f843	fair.o.before
    60718	   2721	    104	  63543	   f837	fair.o.after

Also document the flag a bit.

No change in functionality intended.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a16129..2ef89b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11633,7 +11633,20 @@ out_unlock:
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing);
+/*
+ * This flag serializes load-balancing passes over large domains
+ * (above the NODE topology level) - only one load-balancing instance
+ * may run at a time, to reduce overhead on very large systems with
+ * lots of CPUs and large NUMA distances.
+ *
+ * - Note that load-balancing passes triggered while another one
+ *   is executing are skipped and not re-tried.
+ *
+ * - Also note that this does not serialize rebalance_domains()
+ *   execution, as non-SD_SERIALIZE domains will still be
+ *   load-balanced in parallel.
+ */
+static atomic_t sched_balance_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 /*
  * Scale the max load_balance interval with the number of CPUs in the system.
@@ -11711,7 +11724,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 
 		need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
 		if (need_serialize) {
-			if (!spin_trylock(&balancing))
+			if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
 				goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -11729,7 +11742,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 			interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
 		}
 		if (need_serialize)
-			spin_unlock(&balancing);
+			atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
 out:
 		if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
 			next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;