Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-100420-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:18:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: wenyang.linux@foxmail.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
 <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman
 <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] exit: move trace_sched_process_exit earlier in
 do_exit()
Message-ID: <20240312111826.1b5bec27@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <tencent_277EBFCF545587D4FD41EF932AE972CC6708@qq.com>
References: <tencent_277EBFCF545587D4FD41EF932AE972CC6708@qq.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:25:29 +0800
wenyang.linux@foxmail.com wrote:

> From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>
> 
> Currently coredump_task_exit() takes some time to wait for the generation
> of the dump file. But if the user-space wants to receive a notification
> as soon as possible it maybe inconvenient.
> 
> Move trace_sched_process_exit() earlier in do_exit().
> This way a user-space monitor could detect the exits and
> potentially make some preparations in advance.
> 
> Oleg initially proposed this suggestion, and Steven further provided some
> detailed suggestions, and Mathieu carefully checked the historical code
> and said:
> : I've checked with Matthew Khouzam (maintainer of Trace Compass)
> : which care about this tracepoint, and we have not identified any
> : significant impact of moving it on its model of the scheduler, other
> : than slightly changing its timing.
> : I've also checked quickly in lttng-analyses and have not found
> : any code that care about its specific placement.
> : So I would say go ahead and move it earlier in do_exit(), it's
> : fine by me.
> 

I'm putting together last minute minor patches for this merge window. I can
take this if nobody has any objections.

-- Steve


> Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index 493647fd7c07..2cff6533cb39 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -826,6 +826,7 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
>  
>  	WARN_ON(tsk->plug);
>  
> +	trace_sched_process_exit(tsk);
>  	kcov_task_exit(tsk);
>  	kmsan_task_exit(tsk);
>  
> @@ -866,7 +867,6 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
>  
>  	if (group_dead)
>  		acct_process();
> -	trace_sched_process_exit(tsk);
>  
>  	exit_sem(tsk);
>  	exit_shm(tsk);