Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-100520-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:35:02 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement
Message-ID: <20240312163502.GGZfCENkvNb41IJWPy@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240312155641.4003683-1-yosryahmed@google.com>
 <d24c8736-d963-4aa5-a3cb-5cc1110e3ca8@intel.com>
 <CAJD7tkYXfFiOQMpM+GkR7a=aUxFM-smDc-ZFTTtFu2Kbd2KoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240312161337.GFZfB_MdSFtAUXjeLU@fat_crate.local>
 <CAJD7tkYa_NuX2_PD1sEn6kE6Q0Z0VCyq2T2HK_Qdj-_94+OG_w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkYa_NuX2_PD1sEn6kE6Q0Z0VCyq2T2HK_Qdj-_94+OG_w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:23:48AM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Sure, although I am kinda familiar with that. It would be useful to
> point out what part(s) I may be violating :)

Are you kidding?

Dave just told you.

Lemme paste the whole text for you:

"Don't get discouraged - or impatient

After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.

Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without
comment, but the development process works more smoothly than that now.
You should receive comments within a few weeks (typically 2-3); if that
does not happen, make sure that you have sent your patches to the right
place. Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging
reviewers - possibly longer during busy times like merge windows."

https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

> Right, I am aware of that part. According to the tip tree handbook I
> shouldn't expect them to be handled during the merge window, but do
> x86 folks prefer I hold off on sending them until after the merge
> window?

I believe I speak for all of tip folks when I say that they prefer not
to be spammed with the same set too regularly.

As to when you send: there's never a good moment because our mailboxes
are constantly overflowing.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette