Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-100535-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240312155641.4003683-1-yosryahmed@google.com>
 <d24c8736-d963-4aa5-a3cb-5cc1110e3ca8@intel.com> <CAJD7tkYXfFiOQMpM+GkR7a=aUxFM-smDc-ZFTTtFu2Kbd2KoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240312161337.GFZfB_MdSFtAUXjeLU@fat_crate.local> <CAJD7tkYa_NuX2_PD1sEn6kE6Q0Z0VCyq2T2HK_Qdj-_94+OG_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240312163502.GGZfCENkvNb41IJWPy@fat_crate.local>
In-Reply-To: <20240312163502.GGZfCENkvNb41IJWPy@fat_crate.local>
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:46:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZjHaLpWhn6bKRMwZrgiaK6V3gASB9d--e16xiV8P_7cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, 
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, 
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:35=E2=80=AFAM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrot=
e:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:23:48AM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > Sure, although I am kinda familiar with that. It would be useful to
> > point out what part(s) I may be violating :)
>
> Are you kidding?
>
> Dave just told you.
>
> Lemme paste the whole text for you:
>
> "Don't get discouraged - or impatient
>
> After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are
> busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
>
> Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without
> comment, but the development process works more smoothly than that now.
> You should receive comments within a few weeks (typically 2-3); if that
> does not happen, make sure that you have sent your patches to the right
> place. Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging
> reviewers - possibly longer during busy times like merge windows."
>
> https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

Thanks for sharing that. I have always assumed this was about pinging
or resending patches when reviews are taking too long. In this case, I
was responding to review comments. Maybe I misinterpreted that.

Anyway, sending a new version in the same day is too fast regardless.
I did admit that already. My bad again :)