Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-100555-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:01:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement
Message-ID: <20240312170111.GHZfCKV_brefr6M_2F@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240312155641.4003683-1-yosryahmed@google.com>
 <d24c8736-d963-4aa5-a3cb-5cc1110e3ca8@intel.com>
 <CAJD7tkYXfFiOQMpM+GkR7a=aUxFM-smDc-ZFTTtFu2Kbd2KoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240312161337.GFZfB_MdSFtAUXjeLU@fat_crate.local>
 <CAJD7tkYa_NuX2_PD1sEn6kE6Q0Z0VCyq2T2HK_Qdj-_94+OG_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240312163502.GGZfCENkvNb41IJWPy@fat_crate.local>
 <CAJD7tkZjHaLpWhn6bKRMwZrgiaK6V3gASB9d--e16xiV8P_7cw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkZjHaLpWhn6bKRMwZrgiaK6V3gASB9d--e16xiV8P_7cw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:46:07AM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks for sharing that. I have always assumed this was about pinging
> or resending patches when reviews are taking too long. In this case, I
> was responding to review comments. Maybe I misinterpreted that.

So what I would do, for example, is send my set, collect review
comments, work them in, discuss them and once there are no more, I'll do
a rev+1, test and send again. Not under a week unless it is some really
serious bug.

This is a perfectly fine cadence.

> Anyway, sending a new version in the same day is too fast regardless.
> I did admit that already. My bad again :)

No worries. I'm saying this also for all the others who are reading. :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette