Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756808AbYAGTOT (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:14:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753138AbYAGTOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:14:06 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:57388 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753113AbYAGTOF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:14:05 -0500 From: Len Brown Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center To: Mark Lord Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:12:59 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andrew Morton , Venki Pallipadi , Arjan van de Ven , abelay@novell.com, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl References: <20071130142058.816d1693.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080106231848.762e93c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4782400D.2040802@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <4782400D.2040802@rtr.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801071412.59964.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 21 1. Why does VMware need max_cstate=1 to load quickly? It should not, and the fact that it does means that something somewhere is seriously broken. 2. Why does the "max_csate=1" workaround help only on the dual-core boxes, while the single-core boxes still fail to load quickly? I'm glad that we deleted run-time access to max_cstate -- it seems to have exposed a real bug that needs fixing and has gone unreported until now. Indeed, when the real bug is fixed, I propose that we again move to delete max_cstate as a run-time API. -Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/