Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759051AbYAGWYi (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753668AbYAGWYa (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:30 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:61549 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753005AbYAGWY3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:15:47 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Dhaval Giani , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm/x86] revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem (Was Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1) Message-Id: <20080107141547.7b60b738.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20071222233056.d652743e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080107135038.GA19568@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080107145609.GA26652@elte.hu> <20080107082237.595b266a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1167 Lines: 28 On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:50:49 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:56:09 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i'm also wondering - what would be the easiest way to integrate kexec > > > into an automated test environment. If i have a bzImage kernel, is kexec > > > still supposed to work? Could i for example do a reboot into a new > > > (kexec-enabled) kernel via kexec in essence? > > > > My daily/nightly kernel test runs use kexec to boot the test kernel. > > Well, did thru 2.6.24-rc6-git9, but they fail after that. > > Hopefully this patch fixes things. > > The patch in question is not in mainline, it's in the mm branch of > x86.git. So the problem in mainline is a different one. Could you > bisect it please ? Ugh. As happens during demos, this (kexec failure) won't happen for me when I want it to. I'll keep an eye out for it... --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/