Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758310AbYAGX2i (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:28:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757941AbYAGX2W (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:28:22 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:41285 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757909AbYAGX2V (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:28:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:25:14 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , 7eggert@gmx.de, Christer Weinigel , Ingo Molnar , "David P. Reed" , Rene Herman , Paul Rolland , Pavel Machek , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , rol@witbe.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override. Message-ID: <20080107232514.699155d6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <9BdU5-1YW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BeZN-3Gf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BnTB-1As-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BrX4-8go-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BuBG-4eR-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BvRd-6aL-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GRQW-1DX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GSah-23W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GSDy-2GD-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GTpK-40d-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GUvy-5H2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GVKU-7SS-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <478281A6.1000704@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.3; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 16 > But overclocking is not the problem for udelay, it would err to the safe > side. The problem would be a BUS having < 8 MHz, and since the days of > 80286, they are hard to find. IMO having an option to set the bus speed > for those systems should be enough. If you get it wrong you risk data corruption. Not good, not clever, not appropriate. Basically the use of port 0x80 is the right thing to do for ISA devices and as 15 odd years of use has shown works reliably and solidly for ISA systems. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/