Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758849AbYAGX3j (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:29:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758686AbYAGX32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:29:28 -0500 Received: from smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.200]:52981 "EHLO smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758028AbYAGX31 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:29:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4782B515.3010008@keyaccess.nl> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:26:13 +0100 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, Christer Weinigel , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , "David P. Reed" , Paul Rolland , Pavel Machek , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , rol@witbe.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override. References: <9BdU5-1YW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BeZN-3Gf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BnTB-1As-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BrX4-8go-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BuBG-4eR-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <9BvRd-6aL-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GRQW-1DX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GSah-23W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GSDy-2GD-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GTpK-40d-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GUvy-5H2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <9GVKU-7SS-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <478281A6.1000704@zytor.com> <4782A355.1070207@zytor.com> <4782AED5.1060406@keyaccess.nl> <4782B4B9.2020608@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4782B4B9.2020608@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 23 On 08-01-08 00:24, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Rene Herman wrote: >> >> Is this only about the ones then left for things like legacy PIC and >> PIT? Does anyone care about just sticking in a udelay(2) (or 1) there >> as a replacement and call it a day? >> > > PIT is problematic because the PIT may be necessary for udelay setup. Yes, can initialise loops_per_jiffy conservatively. Just didn't quite get why you guys are talking about an ISA bus speed parameter. Rene. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/