From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:54:56 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@kernel.org>,
       "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
       "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
References: <200801052042.56042.rjw@sisk.pl> <200801062011.31491.rjw@sisk.pl> <82e4877d0801071521s607491f1ue25c4b97de47db71@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <82e4877d0801071521s607491f1ue25c4b97de47db71@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801080054.57916.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2023
Lines: 48

On Tuesday, 8 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Subject             : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> > > > > > Submitter   : "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date                : 2007-12-07 18:14
> > > > > > References  : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/299
> > > > > >               http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9525
> > > > > > Handled-By  : "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> > > > > >               Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > >               Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > > >
> > > > > i think this only occurs with cpuidle, right? drivers/cpuidle/ and
> > > > > CPU_IDLE is new in 2.6.24 so this appears to be a bug in that code (or a
> > > > > bug elsewhere triggered by that code), not a regression from v2.6.23.
> > > >
> > > > OK, removed from the regressions list.
> > >
> > > Nope - actually it did happen without CPU_IDLE so it is definitely a regression.
> > > (See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/93 )
> > >
> > > And it does happen with latest git which I believe has your patch Ingo.
> > >
> > > So I would suggest to keep it on the list of regressions.
> >
> > OK
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> >
> 
> BTW, I have so far tested 2.6.24-rc4/5/6/7 and 2.6.23.12 - all of
> which have this problem.

Well, now you're saying 2.6.23.12 is also affected, so this doesn't seem to
be a recent regression in fact?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/