Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-102391-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:58:07 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com,
	mazziesaccount@gmail.com, ak@it-klinger.de,
	petre.rodan@subdimension.ro, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	phil@raspberrypi.com, 579lpy@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: pressure: Add triggered buffer support for
 BMP280 driver
Message-ID: <ZfH3P9dTiBHpjN5b@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240313174007.1934983-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <20240313174007.1934983-7-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240313174007.1934983-7-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:07PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> Add a buffer struct that will hold the values of the measurements
> and will be pushed to userspace and a buffer_handler function to
> read the data and push them.

..

> +	ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,

dev here

> +					      iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> +					      &bmp280_buffer_handler, NULL);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(data->dev, ret,

data->dev here

Are they the same? If not, why this difference?

> +				     "iio triggered buffer setup failed\n");

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko