Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-102451-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:10 +0100
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>, jic23@kernel.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com, mazziesaccount@gmail.com,
	ak@it-klinger.de, petre.rodan@subdimension.ro,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, phil@raspberrypi.com, 579lpy@gmail.com,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: pressure: add SCALE and RAW values for
 channels
Message-ID: <20240313195110.GB1938985@vamoiridPC>
References: <20240313174007.1934983-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <20240313174007.1934983-4-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <ZfH4bET-HX0e3PO_@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZfH4bET-HX0e3PO_@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:03:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > Add extra IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW in order to be
> > able to calculate the processed value with standard userspace IIO
> > tools. Can be used for triggered buffers as well.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > +		switch (chan->type) {
> > +		case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_humid(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		case IIO_PRESSURE:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_press(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		case IIO_TEMP:
> > +			*val = data->chip_info->read_temp(data);
> > +			ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +			break;
> 
> Is it mutex that prevents us from returning here?
> If so, perhaps switching to use cleanup.h first?
> 

I haven't seen cleanup.h used in any file and now that I searched,
only 5-6 are including it. I am currently thinking if the mutex
that already exists is really needed since most of the drivers
don't have it + I feel like this is something that should be done
by IIO, thus maybe it's not even needed here.

> > +		}
> > +		break;
> 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

Best regards,
Vasileios Amoiridis