Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758099AbYAHGvm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:51:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752858AbYAHGve (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:51:34 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:18965 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbYAHGvd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:51:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Z3K0LScBb+KHJvNkDP9sEZP8XOzOgtTgmhtUqpocGn+YRlOAG3htyNENf9dEHaMdmSZYSTpIH/+stJ/b7zgFnebU491a3UyjEja4EVIOYsJS2pcpPUAkPz52I5ESyVLcy/0Rjze2rwYjeDBxXFQEGb2kltbvq9hFbOeRW1IM6TM= Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:52:43 +0100 From: Marcin Slusarz To: Andrew Morton Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions Message-ID: <20080108065239.GA23875@joi> References: <1199580275-2487-1-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> <1199580275-2487-6-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> <20080107122617.GB3710@infradead.org> <20080107204413.GB22144@joi> <20080107152815.acab7678.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080107152815.acab7678.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 26 On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:28:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100 > Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > > > There's some overly long lines here and some odd style, this should look > > > more like: > > These long lines were split later in "[PATCH 1/7] udf: fix coding style" > > Confused. How can patch 1/n come "later" than this one? > > Your patches actually came through as "[patch] udf: ...". ie: no > sequence numbering. Because there are 2 patchsets. First in third version and second in first version. I think I join them to not confuse anyone... > > (but I will fix it in next version of this patch). > > Please fix the sequence numbering too, thanks. Yeah. I forgot to do this before submission. Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/