Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757084AbYAHHYE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:24:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750925AbYAHHX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:23:56 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57838 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750776AbYAHHX4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:23:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:23:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20080107.232355.228915298.davem@davemloft.net> To: B.Steinbrink@gmx.de Cc: arbrandes@gmail.com, bunk@kernel.org, andi@lisas.de, richie@coderworld.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aabdulla@nvidia.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: forcedeth: MAC-address reversed on resume from suspend From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080107014638.GA4170@atjola.homenet> References: <20080104034357.GA2113@atjola.homenet> <20080107014638.GA4170@atjola.homenet> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1318 Lines: 32 From: Bj?rn Steinbrink Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:46:38 +0100 > On 2008.01.06 19:49:49 -0200, Adolfo R. Brandes wrote: > > I have this forcedeth MAC address reversal problem when suspending > > on 2 distinct boxes. I can confirm Steinbrink's patch fixes the > > problem on only one of them: > > > > 00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev f3) > > > > On the other one the problem persists: > > > > 00:14.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) > > Thanks. Leaves me pretty clueless though. Especially since it worked for > Richard, who also has a MCP51. In a private mail, you said that you had > hardcoded the mac address in the source. Any chance that you applied the > patch on your modified sources and didn't get it right? I am going to push this patch upstream, it is correct and we have a positive test case that failed before, so overall it's a net improvement even if we still don't exactly know why Adolfo's case still fails. Let me know if there are any follow-on patches. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/