Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-102593-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <2e8100b0-d87c-413e-bcb1-b91c3ce41633@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:28:55 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: bus: _OSC fixes
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240309201310.7548-1-W_Armin@gmx.de>
 <CAJZ5v0hKwThcAO4jMOzi7ySqSv_jHvs_+paBB212qVsaf7LZng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hKwThcAO4jMOzi7ySqSv_jHvs_+paBB212qVsaf7LZng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:P2LB0CjAtRs=;UnbPdXSB8tyXnF5xg20gQT1w9ys
 JMctO74RNrzAl1GH29HunkOTFQ4sZqPUDY7ohOKeMMfsloHeDZgDOyer2mLzK5FFPpMu1IBeD
 0H1ZHWTSFrzfFaeJtvOXm6HI5bpyxTEVL5E9cawTXXxT0STq6R0452CERoHHG1w2AXhHdzsNI
 0mmEynM9voaN7qRJfmC4ZiUEnJ6zQi1E2FssXXQVJ/JPAxq82Dih2mr0VsTJb5CHh10WEdBcQ
 pmqQ4qO36zcQg1gwdltwAK8NyRk+EADiqYokRmaTA9JNj1Z1o2wFvWp5S+bE7nJuuGcYZoAIG
 KLxzIuPgTltbvHXKkhb1N27Zxuf/1ke77+MbkJQOST8Mbq5etdubuiTDQ9y1BYzQuFDzn+LM5
 z9IlF3o5Dum4pjBEUekolvUrBPtdZH8aAqI9g7z7JcU10PwqdNj9Ay0+q0RYxaUtuFYX0Qth/
 lB7nebHVcsQciVE53u7RLJaVnSfCH4kRnoKc5KB5KWNXbacHdDNto3OkI10uPfuBQt5Oqysob
 OTseHYAl6Xc6WRhcA8Gi9M1s1tXzIC5Gv2FlnhVj5RaqcWqXEsauHp6iUUts1IjqFxVz0d2Bi
 UyZLY3eOBt10hEy92CwH5PDk19CH+/URD2BBoPdTM3tlOxzD20XW5EccPjSftUeJFiQ50+aNr
 N/NMDlEuj+w8T3SrCP62hdElmBygnk4CLzcUHByKOm3mX1LT7UKIyNK2wtTx3+2F7Uz26s9ZK
 5PSwEJJbxY6NX/6EY59gacnsH1jMdG85RcGCr81DyUJ4fsFNhFGoIx+J2NiM9Ubmm/mzWRXVl
 7q8K79JU8z9B51bF+B20paDAWyz2EN1uuB6rkvMZ+nVSc=

Am 12.03.24 um 21:10 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:

> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 9:13=E2=80=AFPM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrote=
:
>> This patch series fixes the handling of various ACPI features bits
>> when evaluating _OSC.
>>
>> The first three patches fix the reporting of various features supported
>> by the kernel, while the fourth patch corrects the feature bit used to
>> indicate support for the "Generic Initiator Affinity" in SRAT.
>>
>> The last patch fixes the reporting of IRQ ResourceSource support. Unlik=
e
>> the other feature bits, the ACPI specification states that this feature
>> bit might be used by the ACPI firmware to indicate whether or not it
>> supports the usage of IRQ ResourceSource:
>>
>>          "If not set, the OS may choose to ignore the ResourceSource
>>           parameter in the extended interrupt descriptor."
>>
>> Since the code responsible for parsing IRQ ResourceSource already check=
s
>> if ResourceSource is present, i assumed that we can omit taking this
>> into account.
>>
>> All patches where tested on a Asus Prime B650-Plus and a Dell Inspiron
>> 3505.
>>
>> Armin Wolf (5):
>>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for _TFP thru _OSC
>>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for more than 16 p-states thru _OSC
>>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for the Generic Event Device thru _OSC
>>    ACPI: Fix Generic Initiator Affinity _OSC bit
>>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for IRQ ResourceSource thru _OSC
>>
>>   drivers/acpi/bus.c   | 5 +++++
>>   include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++++-
>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --
> All of that looks reasonable to me, but do you know about systems in
> the field where any of these patches actually fix functionality?
>
> If not, I'd prefer to queue them up for 6.10 as they are likely to
> change behavior, at least in corner cases.
>
> Thanks!

Hi,

i know no system which even queries those feature bits, so i am fine with
this landing in 6.10.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf