Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:21:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:21:08 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:56593 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:20:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:20:39 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Jos? Luis Domingo L?pez Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ATA RAID-0 FYI-Did the Impossible. Message-Id: <20020102162039.47398c2a.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20011231190845.GB6585@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011231181104.199b8f23.skraw@ithnet.com> <20011231190845.GB6585@localhost> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 20:08:45 +0100 Jos? Luis Domingo L?pez wrote: > On Monday, 31 December 2001, at 18:11:04 +0100, > Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > Andre, please give us some URL for the patch(es), so we all can try it > > ourselves, every person with a successful try will probably be one of your > > supporters. Is this applyable to 2.4? > > > Maybe this is what Andre is talking about: > http://www.linuxdiskcert.org > > Applies cleanly to 2.4.17, by the way. I tried on top of 2.4.17 on a pretty standard IDE setup (IBM 20 G, ATA 66, VIA chipset) and have no measureable performance difference. But I guess it couldn't have been expected in such an environment. Would be interesting to hear tests from more complex setups. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/