Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-102995-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
To: <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>, <lee@kernel.org>,
	<vadimp@nvidia.com>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	<mazziesaccount@gmail.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <longman@redhat.com>, <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	<nikitos.tr@gmail.com>, <marek.behun@nic.cz>, <kabel@kernel.org>
CC: <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <kernel@salutedevices.com>, George Stark
	<gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/9] locking/mutex: introduce devm_mutex_init
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:45:23 +0300
Message-ID: <20240314084531.1935545-2-gnstark@salutedevices.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240314084531.1935545-1-gnstark@salutedevices.com>
References: <20240314084531.1935545-1-gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain

Using of devm API leads to a certain order of releasing resources.
So all dependent resources which are not devm-wrapped should be deleted
with respect to devm-release order. Mutex is one of such objects that
often is bound to other resources and has no own devm wrapping.
Since mutex_destroy() actually does nothing in non-debug builds
frequently calling mutex_destroy() is just ignored which is safe for now
but wrong formally and can lead to a problem if mutex_destroy() will be
extended so introduce devm_mutex_init()

Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Suggested by-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 include/linux/mutex.h        | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 67edc4ca2bee..f57e005ded24 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
 #include <linux/cleanup.h>
 #include <linux/mutex_types.h>
 
+struct device;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 # define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname)			\
 		, .dep_map = {					\
@@ -117,6 +119,31 @@ do {							\
 } while (0)
 #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+
+int __devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock);
+
+#else
+
+static inline int __devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	/*
+	 * When CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is off mutex_destroy is just a nop so
+	 * no really need to register it in devm subsystem.
+	 */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#define devm_mutex_init(dev, mutex)			\
+({							\
+	typeof(mutex) mutex_ = (mutex);			\
+							\
+	mutex_init(mutex_);				\
+	__devm_mutex_init(dev, mutex_);			\
+})
+
 /*
  * See kernel/locking/mutex.c for detailed documentation of these APIs.
  * Also see Documentation/locking/mutex-design.rst.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index bc8abb8549d2..6aa77e3dc82e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
 
 #include "mutex.h"
 
@@ -89,6 +90,16 @@ void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
 	lock->magic = lock;
 }
 
+static void devm_mutex_release(void *res)
+{
+	mutex_destroy(res);
+}
+
+int __devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_mutex_release, lock);
+}
+
 /***
  * mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable
  * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed
-- 
2.25.1