Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-103023-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:10:33 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work
 on RT.
Message-ID: <20240314091033.woaK8h83@linutronix.de>
References: <20240312180814.3373778-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <CANpmjNMYGa46pRQUOfzTa_FRvftOGqg+UDeD_B-tbZgYw-MWww@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZfHE9Ev5T3Lq7o34@x1>
 <ZfHtBB5_-3RByE8p@x1>
 <ZfHw3J5PY6qy4mXn@x1>
 <ZfIIqcmRlrxwUFTn@x1>
 <ZfIJIfqeI9tWnnS5@x1>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZfIJIfqeI9tWnnS5@x1>

On 2024-03-13 17:14:25 [-0300], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > tldr; No dmesg activity, no kernel splats, most tests passed, nothing
> > noticeable when running with/without the patch with Vince's regression
> > tests. So:
>  
> > Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> 
> Too quick, now I'm testing it on top of torvalds/master, no PREEMPT_RT.

Just to be clear: You revert your Tested-by because now you test this on
torvalds/master but not because you reported a regression which I
missed.

> - Arnaldo

Sebastian