Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-103301-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:30:09 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r@ltts.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m.nirmaladevi@ltts.com, lee@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, jpanis@baylibre.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
	kristo@kernel.org, eblanc@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] regulator: tps6594-regulator: Add TI TPS65224
 PMIC regulators
Message-ID: <4aee8c9a-43eb-45b4-bc23-e58aede18e54@moroto.mountain>
References: <20240308103455.242705-1-bhargav.r@ltts.com>
 <20240308103455.242705-10-bhargav.r@ltts.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240308103455.242705-10-bhargav.r@ltts.com>

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:04:53PM +0530, Bhargav Raviprakash wrote:
> @@ -374,11 +518,17 @@ static int tps6594_request_reg_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  {
>  	struct tps6594_regulator_irq_type *irq_type;
>  	struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> -	int j;
> +	size_t j;
>  	int irq;
>  	int error;
> +	size_t interrupt_cnt;
> +
> +	if (tps->chip_id == TPS6594)
> +		interrupt_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_buck1_irq_types);
> +	else
> +		interrupt_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_buck1_irq_types);
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>  
> -	for (j = 0; j < REGS_INT_NB; j++) {
> +	for (j = 0; j < interrupt_cnt; j++) {
>  		irq_type = &tps6594_regs_irq_types[j];
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_type->irq_name);
>  		if (irq < 0)

The tps6594_regs_irq_types pointer needs to be renamed or people won't
know it's holding tps65224_ data.  Probably the function should be
renamed too.

regards,
dan carpenter