Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-103406-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:34:39 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work
 on RT.
Message-ID: <ZfMK_yTzxTQCMGZ1@x1>
References: <20240312180814.3373778-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <CANpmjNMYGa46pRQUOfzTa_FRvftOGqg+UDeD_B-tbZgYw-MWww@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZfHE9Ev5T3Lq7o34@x1>
 <ZfHtBB5_-3RByE8p@x1>
 <ZfHw3J5PY6qy4mXn@x1>
 <ZfIIqcmRlrxwUFTn@x1>
 <ZfIJIfqeI9tWnnS5@x1>
 <20240314091033.woaK8h83@linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240314091033.woaK8h83@linutronix.de>

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:10:33AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-03-13 17:14:25 [-0300], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > tldr; No dmesg activity, no kernel splats, most tests passed, nothing
> > > noticeable when running with/without the patch with Vince's regression
> > > tests. So:
> >  
> > > Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Too quick, now I'm testing it on top of torvalds/master, no PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> Just to be clear: You revert your Tested-by because now you test this on
> torvalds/master but not because you reported a regression which I
> missed.

You got it right. No regressions, the code is good, I just need to test
it a bit further, with torvalds/master, without PREEMPT_RT.

- Arnaldo