Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-103591-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:48:24 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
 protocol basic support
Message-ID: <ZfMqWP-t39SCvkA2@pluto>
References: <20240314-pinctrl-scmi-v5-0-b19576e557f2@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240314-pinctrl-scmi-v5-0-b19576e557f2@nxp.com>

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:35:17PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> Since SCMI 3.2 Spec is released, and this patchset has got R-b/T-b,
> is it ok to land this patchset?
> 

I'll have a look at this last version and a spin on my test setup.

..but has this V5 change at all since the Reviewed-by tags due to the
latest spec changes ?

..IOW does this V5 include the latest small bits spec-changes or those
latest gpio-related spec-changes are just not needed at the level of the Linux
pinctrl support as of now and can be added later on when a Linux gpio
driver will be built on top of this ?

Thanks,
Cristian