Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-103944-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <bb9f1f58-67f1-49cb-aede-046ec6258ff1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 01:57:21 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dts: arm64: sunxi: add initial support for t95 tv box
Content-Language: pl
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jernej_=C5=A0krabec?= <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
 Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: wens@csie.org, samuel@sholland.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240311174750.6428-1-ressetkk@gmail.com>
 <8344274.T7Z3S40VBb@jernej-laptop>
 <55eda2c6-1bca-463d-a908-1887543a47a5@gmail.com>
 <4331305.ejJDZkT8p0@jernej-laptop>
From: Kamil Kasperski <ressetkk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4331305.ejJDZkT8p0@jernej-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

W dniu 14.03.2024 o 17:50, Jernej Škrabec pisze:
> Dne četrtek, 14. marec 2024 ob 01:19:28 CET je Kamil Kasperski napisal(a):
>> Hi Jernej, Andre!
> Please no top posting as per rules.

Sure. I'm not used to this kind of work, so please bear the mistakes I make.

>
>> Thanks for the reply. My board has a name "H616-T95MAX-AXP313A-v3.0".
> Ok, we for sure need to integrate this somehow to compatible string, since
> there are at least two incompatible versions.

It's good idea to introduce dtsi with common configuration for both boxes and add 2 new dts files with compatible string
"t95,t95max-axp313" and "t95,t95max-axp305" with separate PMIC configuration. Similarly as OrangePI Zero got handled.

Not to mention, that it looks like arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h618-transpeed-8k618-t.dts also has very similar configuration to my T95 box. Question is should we mix up the compatible strings for SoC?
I know that H616 and H618 are almost identical SoCs, but if it's not only a matter of documentation it's still better idea to push new dts.

Best Regards,
Kamil

>> I believe these boards are two different revisions and the one with 
>> AXP313A is a newer one, besides incorrectly label as v3.0. Sharing 
>> common configuration between boxes is also a good idea but for this 
>> specific configuration I would be cautious. From my experience with this 
>> board the default configuration for X96 Mate is not working at all. I 
>> suspect because of the PMIC and DRAM differences.
>>
>> Memory installed in X96 Mate is DDR3L and in mine T95 it's DDR3, hynix 
>> H5TQ2G43BFR, that requires 1.5V to operate.
> PMIC is important difference, yes, but not DRAM. DDR3L is completely compatible
> with DDR3. It just additionally supports lower voltages. Additionally, Linux
> doesn't care about DRAM type and all. It's firmware responsibility to properly
> initialize it.
>
> Best regards,
> Jernej
>
>> The rest of configuration for both boards, like HDMI, MMC, EPHY and 
>> audio codec seems to be the same across almost all H616-based boxes that 
>> I've researched.
>>
>>
>> Moreover please let me update the patches and send v2 that aligns with 
>> mainline branch. I've incorrectly assumed to use sunxi fork instead of 
>> master. Sorry!
>>
>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 19:00, Jernej Škrabec pisze:
>>> Dne sreda, 13. marec 2024 ob 18:38:08 CET je Andre Przywara napisal(a):
>>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:25:14 +0100
>>>> Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Kamil!
>>>>>
>>>>> Dne ponedeljek, 11. marec 2024 ob 18:47:47 CET je Kamil Kasperski napisal(a):
>>>>>> T95 is a most commonly known for being a box with a pre-installed malware.
>>>>>> It uses Allwinner H616 and comes with eMMC and DDR3 memory.
>>>>>> This device comes with two versions - one with AXP305 PMIC and another with AXP313 PMIC.
>>>>> I have this board and it always felt like a clone of X96 Mate, which is
>>>>> already supported in kernel, except for broken sd card detection. Would it
>>>>> make sense to unify those two boards and just overwrite or update parts here
>>>>> that are not the same?
>>>> I think the box you have is an older one, with the AXP305? IIUC, this is
>>>> about a newer revision with the AXP313. There are quite some differences
>>>> between the two PMICs, though it might still make sense to share the DTs,
>>>> see the OrangePi Zero[23].
>>> Right, mine is with AXP305. It has "T95MAX v4.0" printed on PCB.
>>>
>>> Kamil, does your board also have "MAX" mentioned somewhere?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jernej
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Andre
>>>>
>>>>>> Kamil Kasperski (3):
>>>>>>    dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: sunxi: add T95 to vendor-prefixes
>>>>>>    dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add t95 compatible string to list of known
>>>>>>      boards
>>>>>>    dts: arm64: sunxi: add initial support for T95 AXP313 tv box
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml        |   5 +
>>>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile        |   1 +
>>>>>>   .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616-t95-axp313.dts  | 138 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>   4 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
>>>>>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616-t95-axp313.dts
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>