Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-95204-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
IronPort-SDR: OU7dAoQTIbtTp/5fOe/i5uiemmuv4EPuUaryBO/kNFmW7b1BnDXFRL/7gJgrtRGQRzT01R4qEc
 64ohoawppL9w==
From: Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r@ltts.com>
To: linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de,
	bhargav.r@ltts.com,
	broonie@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jpanis@baylibre.com,
	kristo@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	lee@kernel.org,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	m.nirmaladevi@ltts.com,
	nm@ti.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org,
	vigneshr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] pinctrl: pinctrl-tps6594: Add TPS65224 PMIC pinctrl and GPIO
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2024 14:49:25 +0530
Message-Id: <20240307091925.171679-1-bhargav.r@ltts.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZzTheR=+=in7RYTFM2dquEPmGDudB7n1zoiUU4B1UCVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACRpkdZzTheR=+=in7RYTFM2dquEPmGDudB7n1zoiUU4B1UCVg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:24:16 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:37 AM Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r@ltts.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Nirmala Devi Mal Nadar <m.nirmaladevi@ltts.com>
> >
> > Add support for TPS65224 pinctrl and GPIOs to TPS6594 driver as they
> > have significant functional overlap.
> > TPS65224 PMIC has 6 GPIOS which can be configured as GPIO or other
> > dedicated device functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nirmala Devi Mal Nadar <m.nirmaladevi@ltts.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r@ltts.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Is this something I can just merge to the pin control tree, or does it
> need to be applied in lockstep with the other patches?
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

These patches need NOT be applied in lockstep with other patches.

Regards,
Bhargav