Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753858AbYAHTES (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:04:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751462AbYAHTEG (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:04:06 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:56875 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbYAHTEF (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:04:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:04:01 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Ingo Molnar cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 In-Reply-To: <20080108090702.GB27671@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080108021142.585467000@sgi.com> <20080108090702.GB27671@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 15 On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt apply > the s390/etc. bits), right? Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/