Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753421AbYAHT1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:27:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753338AbYAHT04 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:26:56 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:56741 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308AbYAHT0z (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:26:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:26:57 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: travis@sgi.com Cc: mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Christoph Lameter , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 Message-ID: <20080108192657.GC26491@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080108021142.585467000@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080108021142.585467000@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1502 Lines: 41 On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:11:42PM -0800, travis@sgi.com wrote: > > This patchset simplifies the code that arches need to maintain to support > per cpu functionality. Most of the code is moved into arch independent > code. Only a minimal set of definitions is kept for each arch. > > The patch also unifies the x86 arch so that there is only a single > asm-x86/percpu.h > > V1->V2: > - Add support for specifying attributes for per cpu declarations (preserves > IA64 model(small) attribute). > - Drop first patch that removes the model(small) attribute for IA64 > - Missing #endif in powerpc generic config / Wrong Kconfig > - Follow Randy's suggestions on how to do the Kconfig settings > > V2->V3: > - fix x86_64 non-SMP case > - change SHIFT_PTR to SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR > - fix various percpu_modcopy()'s to reference correct per_cpu_offset() > - s390 has a special way to determine the pointer to a per cpu area In your changelog comments you have this: V1->V2 - ... V2->V3 - ... But that really belongs below the "end-of-changelog" comment as this info is relevant only for this submission to lkml and not in whats get committed. As your submission did not include an RFC I assume this is expected to be the final version. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/