Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:39:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:39:20 -0500 Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net ([206.13.28.240]:57060 "EHLO mta6.snfc21.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:39:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:37:41 -0800 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1] To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Matthew Dharm , Greg KH Message-id: <07c401c193bc$90ad5d60$6800000a@brownell.org> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <20011223112249.B4493@kroah.com> <20011230122756.L1821@suse.de> <20011230212700.B652@one-eyed-alien.net> <20011231125157.D1246@suse.de> <20011231145455.C6465@one-eyed-alien.net> <065e01c192fd$fe066e20$6800000a@brownell.org> <20020101233423.I16092@suse.de> <06c801c1934e$1fc01a20$6800000a@brownell.org> <20020102103252.B28530@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > requirement for drivers is that the transfer buffers can be passed to > > pci_map_single() calls by the Host Controller Drivers (HCDs). The > > device drivers, and URBs, don't expose such mappings, they only > > require that they can be created/destroyed. > > .. which is the requirement that you want to change to use pci_map_page > or pci_map_sg OK, I think I'm clear on this much then: in 2.5, to support block drivers over USB (usb-storage only, for now) there needs to be an addition to the buffer addressing model in usbcore, as exposed by URBs. - Current "transfer_buffer" + "transfer_buffer_length" mode needs to stay, since most drivers aren't block drivers. - Add some kind of "page + offset" addressing model. Discussion of details can be taken off LKML, it'd seem. Though I'm curious when the scatterlist->address field will vanish, making these changes a requirement. Is that a 2.5.2 thing? Also, I noticed that include/asm-sparc/pci.h doesn't include the standard pci_map_page() call ... what's up with that? That surely causes portability problems. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/