Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755585AbYAHU05 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:26:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751691AbYAHU0t (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:26:49 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.224]:55305 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751100AbYAHU0r (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:26:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s580oNDpZY6+LflG9pchbXPFVQ15LhvzRp5nibXmDr1zKWza+6iR5CmK1/tcuLZUUjPXXgOsuLNvNxbVkbpqMJYKRUYYKPU/hkuyMBqu1vbrxKIyOzd9NrV6iK1htiNI3I63i2g1Rea8Ka/BQdaMRgw9YyXMU/pbGzytJFNhh4c= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30801081226u8911e19w7e2d3ef5a3545ef8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:26:45 +0100 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: "Matthew Wilcox" Subject: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl Cc: "Andi Kleen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20080108202059.GK16309@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080108164015.GC31504@one.firstfloor.org> <4d8e3fd30801081158j3e7292d0i939776342015b12d@mail.gmail.com> <20080108200044.GI16309@parisc-linux.org> <4d8e3fd30801081203l636c5923j7965efaa9c121c56@mail.gmail.com> <20080108201606.GJ16309@parisc-linux.org> <20080108202059.GK16309@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2430 Lines: 67 On Jan 8, 2008 9:21 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:16:06PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > Yes of course, I've been silly in didn't verify whether the file compile > > > but I would appreciate to know whether I'm on the right track or not. > > > > Well ... you're not. > > Here's what a correct conversion might look like. I haven't tried to > compile it, so I'm copying and pasting it in order to damage whitespace > and make sure nobody tries to compile it. > > index bf1075e..0c543a8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/common/rtctime.c > +++ b/arch/arm/common/rtctime.c > @@ -174,8 +174,7 @@ static unsigned int rtc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table * > return data != 0 ? POLLIN | POLLRDNORM : 0; > } > > -static int rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > - unsigned long arg) > +static long rtc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > { > struct rtc_ops *ops = file->private_data; > struct rtc_time tm; > @@ -183,6 +182,8 @@ static int rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, > void __user *uarg = (void __user *)arg; > int ret = -EINVAL; > > + lock_kernel(); > + > switch (cmd) { > case RTC_ALM_READ: > ret = rtc_arm_read_alarm(ops, &alrm); > @@ -277,6 +278,9 @@ static int rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, > ret = ops->ioctl(cmd, arg); > break; > } > + > + unlock_kernel(); > + > return ret; > } > > @@ -334,7 +338,7 @@ static const struct file_operations rtc_fops = { > .llseek = no_llseek, > .read = rtc_read, > .poll = rtc_poll, > - .ioctl = rtc_ioctl, > + .unlocked_ioctl = rtc_ioctl, > .open = rtc_open, > .release = rtc_release, > .fasync = rtc_fasync, > Thank you Matthew, I definitely need to back studying before submitting another patch. Ciao, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/