Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-105559-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:12:57 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Richard Alpe <richard@bit42.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of
 fsl,layerscape-sfp
Message-ID: <20240317211257.GA2317294-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20240316002026.1808336-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240316002026.1808336-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev>

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:20:25PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> These bindings document the same hardware (just different minor
> revisions). Remove the newer fsl,t1023-sfp.
> 
> Fixes: aa1ed6047107 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add t1023-sfp efuse support")

I don't think Fixes is appropriate here. What was broken?

> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> ---
> 
>  .../bindings/nvmem/fsl,layerscape-sfp.yaml    | 21 ++++++++++-
>  .../bindings/nvmem/fsl,t1023-sfp.yaml         | 37 -------------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/fsl,t1023-sfp.yaml

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>