Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755495AbYAHVoY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:44:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754067AbYAHVoM (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:44:12 -0500 Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com ([72.14.202.180]:51470 "EHLO ro-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751590AbYAHVoL (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:44:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bIrGAaDNQmipmpC067OKky5HwJkLS3wr6Bn5lPU4W3+d8oP/1ybJ75SfewveAtCczYEZOhBI1p7hMjhE/qyZCn8oYAk9GwnyUsQiteL30Jhn7F5G1bpCbejD9N5I3Ix8GtUGfTJNqXjgZvvrVPCYIsTo16ZD0kVK+K1IWu1oEew= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0801081344i55100937qc1ad178dd94c358b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:44:08 -0500 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: "Pierre Ossman" Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080108214946.03018d95@poseidon.drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200801081329.39611.vapier.adi@gmail.com> <20080108202157.0b8d3393@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <200801081440.49683.vapier.adi@gmail.com> <20080108214946.03018d95@poseidon.drzeus.cx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1604 Lines: 30 On Jan 8, 2008 3:49 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:40:49 -0500 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i dont understand what's confusing. the Blackfin on chip host controller only > > supports 1-bit MMC, but it supports 4-bit SD/SDIO. this is a fact. while it > > may be a stupid decision, it is what it is, and i need the framework made > > more flexible in order to get the Blackfin driver merged cleanly. we do > > software for hardware, we dont do hardware. > > Well, since I've seen no _hardware_ differences between 4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD, "support" in this case must me "vendor will guarantee it works". And that is not the kind of "support" that needs a distinction in the code. regardless of where the limitation is, the change is necessary. however you wish to classify the issue, it doesnt matter to me. the Blackfin controller needs to declare the following capabilities: - 1-bit MMC - 1-bit SD / 4-bit SD - 1-bit SDIO / 4-bit SDIO the existing framework is not flexible enough to account for this, thus the patch posted. > So, again, if you feel that there is a hardware difference between 4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD then please elaborate as it is my understanding that they are identical. you may be 100% correct, i have no idea, i'm not really familiar with MMC/SD/SDIO at all. -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/