Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:57:19 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
       Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
       mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, trivial@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/ia32/ia32_aout.c
Message-ID: <20080108235719.GA28353@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <20080108203233.01bb5c7f@paolo-desktop> <20080108150439.6388028e@bree.surriel.com> <20080108215247.GE14829@elte.hu> <20080108221722.GA27698@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080108223554.GE21482@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080108223554.GE21482@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 856
Lines: 20

> 
> > > Firstly, anyone with a forked kernel with outstanding patches that 
> > > are not in x86.git only has themselves to blame. We want to actively 
> > > discourage forking and sitting on patches too long.
> > 
> > Curious - what is the purpose of the x86.git tree these days?
> 
> what do want to imply by 'these days'?

I wondered when you wrote "anyone with a forked kernel with outstanding
patches that are not in x86.git" if this was only x86 specific patches
or more than that. I could have a slev of patches in the works
for parts that are no x86 specific (which I unfortunately do not have).

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/