Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-106825-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:45:45 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on
 walk_relocs
Message-ID: <202403181644.690285D3@keescook>
References: <20240317150547.24910-1-weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
 <171079804927.224083.15609364452504732018.b4-ty@chromium.org>
 <20240318215612.GDZfi4fG52DTgra51p@fat_crate.local>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240318215612.GDZfi4fG52DTgra51p@fat_crate.local>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:56:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:40:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Applied to for-next/hardening
> 
> Why?
> 
> This is a patch that should go through the tip tree, if at all.

The commit it refs to landed via -hardening, so I was taking the
responsibility of landing this fix too. But it's fine to go via
-tip if you prefer?

-- 
Kees Cook